Skip to main content

2026-04-14 Kodak Super Heavy Duty Batteries

I noticed an ad in a sale catalogue from Princess Auto for Kodak Super Heavy Duty Batteries. They are made with a Zinc-Chloride mixture, which is different than the normal Carbon-Zinc found in other “Heavy Duty” batteries. 
    Before we go on we should point out any battery labelled “Heavy Duty” are the weakest batteries made. In order of capacity disposable batteries go—
  1. Heavy Duty (Carbon-Zinc)
  2. Alkaline (high capacity and good life)
  3. Nickel Cadmium (Ni-Cad—strongest power, but limited capacity)
  4. Lithium (powerful and high capacity)
Some are “rechargeable” to a small degree, and some are not.
    I looked up what a zinc-chloride battery has as an advantage and found they have a very long life on the shelf—in the range of at least 3-years. They are slightly higher capacity than the carbon-zinc batteries. They are not rechargeable!
    I ended up going to Princess Auto after the sale date. Princess Auto has a large Surplus area and these batteries were part of that category. Sometimes Surplus items are available long after the “Sale”.
    I found the batteries in the alley herding the public to the check-outs. Much to my delight I found both the advertised four batteries for $.99, but another deal of 14-batteries for $2.22. Obviously a much better deal at 16¢ a battery instead of 25¢ each.*
    I snapped a pack of 14-AA size and 14-AAA size. After all, when am I going to get such an opportunity again?
    Batteries are the mine field of photography.
    Camera rechargeable batteries all seem to require different dedicated chargers or cords. Sometimes the batteries have to be recharged and discharged several times to hit their capacity. 
    Then there are flash units. 
    The flash units without built-in rechargeable NiCad batteries almost all use AA size batteries. Some require alkaline—although you are welcome to use Heavy Duty carbon zinc if you are looking at a really small number of shots—and specify not using Ni-Cad (danger of overheating the flash electronics).    Some flash really prefer Ni-Cad and handle them with faster recycling, but of course less reserve power than alkaline batteries (faster performance but fewer shots).


    The back of the blister pack does point out the batteries are best for low drain products. For high power applications the Kodak Alkaline battery is best. 
Ideally these low drain batteries would work well in toys with sounds, clocks, weather stations, timers and the like. In this use the batteries life time is important, while the demand for real power is not high. At the same time these batteries are slightly higher in power than the Carbon-Zinc Heavy Duty batteries, so can be used in a high demand item like a camera with a built-in flash, or to stretch a point an electronic flash. 
    In all uses the Kodak “Zinc” battery is better than regular “Heavy Duty”.

*You can buy bulk packages of AA and AA alkaline batteries at many retailers. It is not uncommon to buy 24 and even 40 battery packs in the $10-14 range. That makes them cost 25-35¢ each. On the other hand Alkaline batteries might have a shelf-life problem. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026-03-14 - History and Evolution of the Kodak Logo

  While working as a junior clerk at the Rochester Savings Bank, George Eastman first began commercial production of dry photographic plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, New York in April 1880. In the next few years, Eastman became very successful and expanded the company several times. His company started as the Eastman Dry Plate Company in 1881, later became the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company in 1884, and soon after the Eastman Company in 1889. The last name change occurred in 1892, when the Eastman Kodak Company of New York was organized. The company has been called Eastman Kodak Company ever since.  The word "Kodak" was first registered as a trademark in 1888. The letter “K” had been a favorite of Eastman’s, he is quoted as saying, "I devised the name myself. The letter 'K' had been a favorite with me; it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made word...

2026-03-20-Manfrotto monopods

  Sometimes collecting is a matter of persistence.       The Manfrotto “GRUPPO” 434SSB monopod (shown top) showed up one day at my local thrift store. They had a price tag of $25 on it. I had bought the lower Manfrotto Compact MMC3-01 monopod at the same thrift store for $3. So I asked, “Why so much?” They answered their “expert” had found it sold for $200 on the internet. I find experts—who almost never clerk in the thrift store, so are unreachable—hard to deal with. There is also the matter someone might actually pay them $25 for a 2.27 kg (5 pound) aluminum pole, so I decided to let the Gods-of-Collecting decide if I was going to ever own it. For weeks I would pick it up, check the price tag to see if they had come to their senses, and return it to the shelf. I did try various clerks to see if they would lower the price, but they said they were not authorized to change prices. I plodded on, week after week without much hope.         ...

2026-03-25 The Kiron 70-150 mm F/4

This Kiron 70-150 mm f/4 Macro1:4MC zoom was made by Kino Precision, Japan in 1980. The same company made both 1.5x and 2x extenders for this lens. It is a lovely design featuring a 52 mm filter size —common to many normal lenses—and a constant f/4 at all zoom positions. The f/stops are full stops from f/4 to f/5.6 and from f/16 to f/22 while the other apertures are half stops apart. FOCAL LENGTH RANGE:          70mm - 150mm [2.1X zoom ratio] DIAGONAL ANGLE OF VIEW: 34.3° @ 70mm - 16.4° @ 150mm   LENS CONSTRUCTION: 13 elements in 9 groups WEIGHT (Olympus OM Mount): 460 g (with hood, front and rear caps) The macro range sets in below the three foot (0.9 m) marked distance at all zoom positions but you only get to the minimum 1:4 ratio at 150 mm. Macro starts around a 1:8 macro range at 70 mm. This is the only lens I have ever collected that has the original price sticker on the rear cap. At least I assume it is the original price sticker… It ha...