Skip to main content

2026-04-23 "Field of Diamonds" Test of a Camera's Lens

I am sure some of you must wonder just how flat and sharp to the edges your camera’s images can be. I happen to find this flexible 8.25 x 12.25 cm (3.25 by 5 inch) plastic mesh of little reflectors. There are 24 on the long side and 16 on the short side for a total of 384 little reflective points.
I thought this might be a great test subject of flatness of field and distortion.
 

    Just to set some sort of baseline to actual testing I scanned the mesh at 200 dpi on a flatbed scanner. It will demonstrate the exact sharpness you can get having an object exactly square to the lens (of the scanner). It sets a very high bar, unless you happen to have a copy stand, because exactly setting the mesh up with the lens exactly centered and parallel with the camera’s sensor is a huge part of the battle.
    I used my FujiFilm Z10 family camera. It isn’t much to write home about as a camera, being a consumer point-and-shoot with 3x internal zoom, 7 Meg files and some signs it has barrel distortion in the wide zoom end it opens with. I set the camera up on a small Velbon tabletop tripod that looks like a tube with three wide-spread feet and a ball head on the top (you will be seeing the tripod's feet in some shots).
    Knowing the problem with barrel distortion—and the problem the tripod was too high to get the mesh subject close enough to fill the frame—I tried this compromise. I tried to square the top of the frame and the right side and let the other two sides fall where they would. I was pretty impressed with how close to the flatbed scan results this camera could produce.



(above)This is the same shot as before, just cropped so the mesh fills the frame edge-to-edge. We will return to comparing the center and corner at the end.


Figuring I should try zooming in until the mesh filled the frame. The mesh is not exactly square as the small plastic connectors distort a bit. Still, the corners rival the center.


In an attempt to be fair to Fuji I zoomed the lens all the way out—all the shots were taken in “Macro” mode—just so you might see the aforementioned barrel distortion. Is it just me, or does the center of each side seem ballooned out (as in the definition of barrel distortion. 

This is the last shot cropped tight using the left edge as a straight edge. The right edge seems pretty square too, but the top bows down and the bottom bows up.

    Taking a bite out of the previous cropped image, this is the center sharpness.











    And this is the corner sharpness (give or take a row or column to get the same number of reflectors). 
    Of course you don’t need a mesh of reflectors to play with testing. Anything from a chess/checker board to a block wall can be shot for testing purposes. But once you start testing, you face the testing conditions can influence the results. Changing illumination, changing of the steadiness of the support, changing subjects (high contrast/low contrast), changing focus (one place autofocus can vary)…it can be a never ending challenge.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2026-03-14 - History and Evolution of the Kodak Logo

  While working as a junior clerk at the Rochester Savings Bank, George Eastman first began commercial production of dry photographic plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, New York in April 1880. In the next few years, Eastman became very successful and expanded the company several times. His company started as the Eastman Dry Plate Company in 1881, later became the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company in 1884, and soon after the Eastman Company in 1889. The last name change occurred in 1892, when the Eastman Kodak Company of New York was organized. The company has been called Eastman Kodak Company ever since.  The word "Kodak" was first registered as a trademark in 1888. The letter “K” had been a favorite of Eastman’s, he is quoted as saying, "I devised the name myself. The letter 'K' had been a favorite with me; it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made word...
Post a Comment
Read more

2026-03-20-Manfrotto monopods

  Sometimes collecting is a matter of persistence.       The Manfrotto “GRUPPO” 434SSB monopod (shown top) showed up one day at my local thrift store. They had a price tag of $25 on it. I had bought the lower Manfrotto Compact MMC3-01 monopod at the same thrift store for $3. So I asked, “Why so much?” They answered their “expert” had found it sold for $200 on the internet. I find experts—who almost never clerk in the thrift store, so are unreachable—hard to deal with. There is also the matter someone might actually pay them $25 for a 2.27 kg (5 pound) aluminum pole, so I decided to let the Gods-of-Collecting decide if I was going to ever own it. For weeks I would pick it up, check the price tag to see if they had come to their senses, and return it to the shelf. I did try various clerks to see if they would lower the price, but they said they were not authorized to change prices. I plodded on, week after week without much hope.         ...
Post a Comment
Read more

2026-03-25 The Kiron 70-150 mm F/4

This Kiron 70-150 mm f/4 Macro1:4MC zoom was made by Kino Precision, Japan in 1980. The same company made both 1.5x and 2x extenders for this lens. It is a lovely design featuring a 52 mm filter size —common to many normal lenses—and a constant f/4 at all zoom positions. The f/stops are full stops from f/4 to f/5.6 and from f/16 to f/22 while the other apertures are half stops apart. FOCAL LENGTH RANGE:          70mm - 150mm [2.1X zoom ratio] DIAGONAL ANGLE OF VIEW: 34.3° @ 70mm - 16.4° @ 150mm   LENS CONSTRUCTION: 13 elements in 9 groups WEIGHT (Olympus OM Mount): 460 g (with hood, front and rear caps) The macro range sets in below the three foot (0.9 m) marked distance at all zoom positions but you only get to the minimum 1:4 ratio at 150 mm. Macro starts around a 1:8 macro range at 70 mm. This is the only lens I have ever collected that has the original price sticker on the rear cap. At least I assume it is the original price sticker… It ha...
Post a Comment
Read more