Skip to main content

2026-07-08 Fairies on Film—The Cottingley Secret by Hazel Gaynor

     
    I have been running into photography in fiction recently. I randomly chose a book called The Cottingley Secret—by Hazel Gaynor at my local library. It was a stunningly juggled time warp featuring two cousins brought together during the First World War and a female descendent in Modern Ireland. It masterfully combines actual facts with fictitious elements.
    The book has two children record Fairies on film. Then they kept the secret of whether the photos had been faked for 70-years!
    Frances Griffiths was nine and a half when she returned from South Africa to England so her father could join the Army to fight the Germans in WW 1. Frances and her mother stayed with relatives who had a 16 year-old daughter named Elsie Wright. The two girls got to share a single bed. They also shared time at a “beck”, a small waterfall behind their row house. This is were the Fairies were found. 
    Frances was so fond of looking for Fairies she often returned home with wet skirts from playing at the edge of the beck. At the point of being banned from being able to go back, she sweet talked a loaded camera from her uncle (who had his own darkroom) so she could take a photograph of them.
    The two girls use two real cameras—a Midg and later a pair of Cameo’s— to capture Fairies. Their images were so convincing they passed examination by experts from Kodak who testified the negatives, “Had not been manipulated in any way.” 
    This attracted the interest of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle—the author of Sherlock Holmes mysteries—who published the original two fairy images in his first Strand Magazine. He stated the pictures were proof fairies actually existed. Years later he featured more photographs of fairies the girls took for him
    It was mentioned in the book that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle had written propaganda during the War. He felt guilty about his writing afterwards because it had convinced many young men to go off to their deaths, including his own son. He felt the proof that fairies could be real was a ray of hope for those overwhelmed by the grimness of post war life.
    All the fairies captured in the photographs were drawings of fairies attached to hat pins. The girls tore the drawings into small pieces and threw them away. The pins were pushed into the ground. Then they were sort of trapped in their lie as neither wanted to get the other into trouble, so they would say, “they just captured what was actually there.” Between the Great Wars there were spiritual groups who had experts that were sure fairies were real that jumped on the validity of the photographs.
    I think it is pretty remarkable the girls took some very clear images working on their own with pretty advanced and complicated cameras. 

The Cottingley Fairy Photos


Frances and the Fairy Ring
(1917)

The first photograph, taken by Elsie. This was labeled “Alice and the Fairies” in Conan Doyle’s first Strand Magazine article.


Elsie and the Gnome
(1917)

The second photograph, taken by Frances. This was labeled “Iris and the Dancing Gnome” in Conan Doyle’s first Strand Magazine article.


Frances and the Leaping Fairy
(1920)

The third photograph, taken by Elsie. This was labeled “Alice and the Leaping Fairy” in Conan Doyle’s second Strand Magazine article.


Elsie Presented with Flowers (1920)
The fourth photograph, taken by Francis. This was labeled, “Iris with Fairy carrying a bunch of Harebells” in Conan Doyle’s second Strand Magazine article.


Bower of fairies (1920)

The fifth photograph, taken by Francis. This was labeled, “Bower of fairies,” where just fairies were taken as they danced in a hollow in the grass. This image wasn’t faked with drawings and hat pins, but how or what it showed isn’t explained in the book.

Notes on the cameras from McKeowan’s Price Guide to Antique and Classic Cameras
11th edition, 2001-2002

Butcher (W. Butcher & Sons, London, England)


Midg c1902-1920

A series of imported drop-plate magazine cameras in 3¼ x 4¼” or postcard (3¼ x 5½ “) sizes. 
The No.0 is the simplest, with built-in shutter and lens. Shutter speed dial is low on the front.

The Models
1,2,3 and 4 have a hinged front which conceals the better lens and shutter.




Cameo
A series of folding plate cameras imported from Germany, introduced around the turn of the century and continuing for many years in all sorts of variations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026-03-14 - History and Evolution of the Kodak Logo

  While working as a junior clerk at the Rochester Savings Bank, George Eastman first began commercial production of dry photographic plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, New York in April 1880. In the next few years, Eastman became very successful and expanded the company several times. His company started as the Eastman Dry Plate Company in 1881, later became the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company in 1884, and soon after the Eastman Company in 1889. The last name change occurred in 1892, when the Eastman Kodak Company of New York was organized. The company has been called Eastman Kodak Company ever since.  The word "Kodak" was first registered as a trademark in 1888. The letter “K” had been a favorite of Eastman’s, he is quoted as saying, "I devised the name myself. The letter 'K' had been a favorite with me; it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made word...

2026-03-20-Manfrotto monopods

  Sometimes collecting is a matter of persistence.       The Manfrotto “GRUPPO” 434SSB monopod (shown top) showed up one day at my local thrift store. They had a price tag of $25 on it. I had bought the lower Manfrotto Compact MMC3-01 monopod at the same thrift store for $3. So I asked, “Why so much?” They answered their “expert” had found it sold for $200 on the internet. I find experts—who almost never clerk in the thrift store, so are unreachable—hard to deal with. There is also the matter someone might actually pay them $25 for a 2.27 kg (5 pound) aluminum pole, so I decided to let the Gods-of-Collecting decide if I was going to ever own it. For weeks I would pick it up, check the price tag to see if they had come to their senses, and return it to the shelf. I did try various clerks to see if they would lower the price, but they said they were not authorized to change prices. I plodded on, week after week without much hope.         ...

2026-03-25 The Kiron 70-150 mm F/4

This Kiron 70-150 mm f/4 Macro1:4MC zoom was made by Kino Precision, Japan in 1980. The same company made both 1.5x and 2x extenders for this lens. It is a lovely design featuring a 52 mm filter size —common to many normal lenses—and a constant f/4 at all zoom positions. The f/stops are full stops from f/4 to f/5.6 and from f/16 to f/22 while the other apertures are half stops apart. FOCAL LENGTH RANGE:          70mm - 150mm [2.1X zoom ratio] DIAGONAL ANGLE OF VIEW: 34.3° @ 70mm - 16.4° @ 150mm   LENS CONSTRUCTION: 13 elements in 9 groups WEIGHT (Olympus OM Mount): 460 g (with hood, front and rear caps) The macro range sets in below the three foot (0.9 m) marked distance at all zoom positions but you only get to the minimum 1:4 ratio at 150 mm. Macro starts around a 1:8 macro range at 70 mm. This is the only lens I have ever collected that has the original price sticker on the rear cap. At least I assume it is the original price sticker… It ha...