Skip to main content

2026-07-30 Energizer E2 Lithium Photo 223 battery

 I recently acquired two point-and-shoot cameras, both of which used Lithium 223 batteries. In the course of trying to take their images I went to my battery stash. I have many batteries lying around, both from removing them from cameras before I stored them and from the occasions I lucked upon battery sales.
    Getting a battery from the collection is a multiple step process. I store batteries in several places for starters. Then there is the step of getting out the battery tester. Simple cells like AAA and AA batteries I use a LED tester that has red, yellow and green lights. Button and Lithium batteries I use a voltmeter.
    I found the batteries that had been in the cameras were down to 0.224 Volts, so clearly they were bound for recycling. I tested some of the 223 batteries I had in the pile of batteries and found two that indicated over 6 Volts. I have found if a lithium battery is under 6 Volts it won’t power up many cameras. I keep the under voltage lithium batteries around to place in cameras to “form” their electronics, but don’t trust them to actually bring a stored camera back to life.
    I found  two used batteries I inserted into both cameras, but one indicated a partial battery symbol on its display and the camera wouldn’t come to life. The second battery had a taped shell and I wasn’t sure the battery contacts were making contact with the camera’s contacts.
    
    Eventually both cameras came to life. One wasn’t powering itself into extending its lens mount. I decided to try a more recent battery and found this Energizer E2 Lithium Photo 223 battery. Upon close examination—that bottom left printing—I could see the battery was to be used before 2015. Since I wrote this story three months into 2025, the battery was ten years past its due date! *
    The battery really showed it was powerful, but the camera itself is still malfunctioning. Trying to get the lens to erect just makes a skipping rack and pinion sound without anything happening as far as the lens extending. Flash yes, autofocus yes, but telephoto no.

*Update: It is now July/2026 and the battery is still fine!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026-03-14 - History and Evolution of the Kodak Logo

  While working as a junior clerk at the Rochester Savings Bank, George Eastman first began commercial production of dry photographic plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, New York in April 1880. In the next few years, Eastman became very successful and expanded the company several times. His company started as the Eastman Dry Plate Company in 1881, later became the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company in 1884, and soon after the Eastman Company in 1889. The last name change occurred in 1892, when the Eastman Kodak Company of New York was organized. The company has been called Eastman Kodak Company ever since.  The word "Kodak" was first registered as a trademark in 1888. The letter “K” had been a favorite of Eastman’s, he is quoted as saying, "I devised the name myself. The letter 'K' had been a favorite with me; it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made word...

2026-03-20-Manfrotto monopods

  Sometimes collecting is a matter of persistence.       The Manfrotto “GRUPPO” 434SSB monopod (shown top) showed up one day at my local thrift store. They had a price tag of $25 on it. I had bought the lower Manfrotto Compact MMC3-01 monopod at the same thrift store for $3. So I asked, “Why so much?” They answered their “expert” had found it sold for $200 on the internet. I find experts—who almost never clerk in the thrift store, so are unreachable—hard to deal with. There is also the matter someone might actually pay them $25 for a 2.27 kg (5 pound) aluminum pole, so I decided to let the Gods-of-Collecting decide if I was going to ever own it. For weeks I would pick it up, check the price tag to see if they had come to their senses, and return it to the shelf. I did try various clerks to see if they would lower the price, but they said they were not authorized to change prices. I plodded on, week after week without much hope.         ...

2026-06-23 Olympus Camedia D-535 Digital Camera

The Olympus Camedia D-535 digital camera is a cute little camera, introduced September 16, 2004. It was modestly priced at about $175 list.   It had the motto, “one button/one function.” There were four scene modes available, as well as movies (QuickTime / 320x240 at 15 fps for as long as the memory held out) and “Program-Auto” on the rotary dial. A four direction with a center “OK” allowed rapid access to (starting at 12 and going clockwise)— EV adjustments plus and minus 2EV in ½ EV steps Macro (including Super-Macro allowing shooting down to 2 cm (0.79”) Reset Self-timer (12 seconds)      The three buttons under the 1.5 inch (130,000 dot) screen (from left) are delete, menu access and flash modes. The two buttons to the right of the screen are camera (top) and playback. There is a rocker switch for zooming that doubles as a magnification /file views switch on playback. The power-on button is inset into the top at the middle of the camera, with the shutter button ...