Skip to main content

2026-11-03 Removing Filters Stuck On Lenses

I recently acquired a Canon A-1 that came with a dented-rim Kitstar Coated UV filter on its FD 50 mm f/1.8 lens. The dent was relatively unnoticeable, but it bothered me that installing any more filters was going to be impossible.
    I had tried the standard unscrewing tricks. I placed a jar lid rubber pad on the kitchen counter and tried twisting the mounted-on-camera-lens face down. That didn’t work, the pad just twisted up and lost grip. I used my palm against the rim twisting again, and again had no luck. I was slightly afraid I was going to damage the lens.
    So I resolved to try gripping the very rim of the filter’s threads with a set of pliers and then hit the pliers with a hammer in a rotary direction. If you thought I was in danger of hurting the lens before, I was well past that with this maneuver!
    The pliers wouldn’t grip well enough. so I tried bending the metal filter rim out to make it less distorted. Nothing changed. It still wouldn’t unscrew from the lens.

    Then I thought maybe removing the glass from the filter might relieve some tension on the threads. I drove a pointed tool between the retainer ring and the threaded filter mount. While bending it out I was surprised when a small chunk of the retainer ring pinged off the room’s wall. The retainer ring is plastic.
    The retainer ring and glass filter fell out of the rim. Then the filter mount simply unscrewed from the lens.
    When next back in the store buying another lens, I again encountered a stuck-on filter. The store owner said, “Just use your shoe.” I was perplexed by the suggestion. How to use a shoe? Take the shoe off and use it as a hammer to smash the glass? Take the shoe off and use the sides of the shoe to grip the rim of the filter? What?
    The owner asked to have the lens back cross the counter. Then he bent backwards—while still perched on a stool—and reached down with the lens to press the filter against his shoe’s rubber heel. He twisted his arm once and held the lens back up to me. I found the filter was loose and easily unscrewed. It did have some dust on it, pressed in a pattern suspiciously similar to the texture of a shoe heel. The filter wasn’t scratched and cleaned up as good as new.
    
    Finally, and this image isn’t a really good illustration of the trick, you can use an “exercise/stress” ball. You want a ball large enough the rim of the filter gets a good “bite” on the ball. Then you use the ball’s additional grip and your additional torque to remove the filter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

2026-03-14 - History and Evolution of the Kodak Logo

  While working as a junior clerk at the Rochester Savings Bank, George Eastman first began commercial production of dry photographic plates in a rented loft of a building in Rochester, New York in April 1880. In the next few years, Eastman became very successful and expanded the company several times. His company started as the Eastman Dry Plate Company in 1881, later became the Eastman Dry Plate and Film Company in 1884, and soon after the Eastman Company in 1889. The last name change occurred in 1892, when the Eastman Kodak Company of New York was organized. The company has been called Eastman Kodak Company ever since.  The word "Kodak" was first registered as a trademark in 1888. The letter “K” had been a favorite of Eastman’s, he is quoted as saying, "I devised the name myself. The letter 'K' had been a favorite with me; it seems a strong, incisive sort of letter. It became a question of trying out a great number of combinations of letters that made word...

2026-03-20-Manfrotto monopods

  Sometimes collecting is a matter of persistence.       The Manfrotto “GRUPPO” 434SSB monopod (shown top) showed up one day at my local thrift store. They had a price tag of $25 on it. I had bought the lower Manfrotto Compact MMC3-01 monopod at the same thrift store for $3. So I asked, “Why so much?” They answered their “expert” had found it sold for $200 on the internet. I find experts—who almost never clerk in the thrift store, so are unreachable—hard to deal with. There is also the matter someone might actually pay them $25 for a 2.27 kg (5 pound) aluminum pole, so I decided to let the Gods-of-Collecting decide if I was going to ever own it. For weeks I would pick it up, check the price tag to see if they had come to their senses, and return it to the shelf. I did try various clerks to see if they would lower the price, but they said they were not authorized to change prices. I plodded on, week after week without much hope.         ...

2026-06-23 Olympus Camedia D-535 Digital Camera

The Olympus Camedia D-535 digital camera is a cute little camera, introduced September 16, 2004. It was modestly priced at about $175 list.   It had the motto, “one button/one function.” There were four scene modes available, as well as movies (QuickTime / 320x240 at 15 fps for as long as the memory held out) and “Program-Auto” on the rotary dial. A four direction with a center “OK” allowed rapid access to (starting at 12 and going clockwise)— EV adjustments plus and minus 2EV in ½ EV steps Macro (including Super-Macro allowing shooting down to 2 cm (0.79”) Reset Self-timer (12 seconds)      The three buttons under the 1.5 inch (130,000 dot) screen (from left) are delete, menu access and flash modes. The two buttons to the right of the screen are camera (top) and playback. There is a rocker switch for zooming that doubles as a magnification /file views switch on playback. The power-on button is inset into the top at the middle of the camera, with the shutter button ...